This final day of the week, and the last blogging day of the month is flush with topics for commentary, but working its way to the top is the neverending rant from Milwaukee right-wing radio gossip, Mark Belling.
Belling, for the uninitiated, chooses to feud with the Small Business Times (SBT) over the 'correct' way to comment on what is wrong with Milwaukee's business climate. Belling claims he knows it all.
For an accurate description of the third chapter see, see the latest response from SBT executive editor, Steve Jagler. Standing up against what's wrong for Milwaukee: Part III:
These are bright people sounding the alarms about the issues our region faces and offering their suggestions for progress. And SBT was happy, proud and able to serve as the conduit of their thoughts...As for Belling, I am compelled here to quote the great Mark Twain: "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." (ed note: see Mark Belling: Milwaukee's White American)
Unlike my buddy Ed Garvey who asks in his blog, fightingbob.com, "Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?" I am just going to muscle my way alongside Jalger and take another free poke at punch-drunk Belling.
First my relationship with Jagler. We disagree on a lot from school choice to taxation. Jagler is what I would call a Tommy Thompson Republican, a good companion at dinner or a ballgame, but not a reliable vote in the legislature.
Jagler and I do agree on one two things that separate us from Belling. Criticism of Milwaukee's, or Wisconsin's business climate should not be for the purpose of laying blame or 'scoring idealogical points.' Instead, analysis must be from the perspective of quality, where we attempt to learn, to plan, and to make necessary improvements.
People will not be candid, and will not participate in changing structures and institutions in a poisoned environment that lacks trust.
Jagler's motives are easy to figure. He is trying to improve Milwaukee.
Belling's are just as easy to figure. Belling is focused on right-wing ideological purity. That means drive out the RINOS. He will drive them out of the legislature and the business community.
That is why Belling not only attacks Jagler, but also Milwukee 7 (M7), healthcare providers like Aurora, and Republicans who might work for a budget compromise.
The other possible subjects for today were:
- Thursday's brewer game provided more documentation to get rid of manager Yost.
- Wednesday' Wisconsin state Journal story on taxes.
- More of the McClellan - Bush-Iraq story.
- Why the price of gasoline may be about to drop.
- Is Yost gone yet?
I really go between thinking Belling needs to get off the radio because of his right wing propaganda and then thinking he should stay on because he drives many conservatives into the progressive camp because of his no compromise ideological viewpoints. The Belling and ideologues propaganda starts from the point that there should be no regulation and no taxes, and maybe compromise slightly from there. A viewpoint the majority of Americans, while not liking taxes, don't agree with.
Posted by: buckyblue | May 30, 2008 at 06:24 AM
What Paul Soglin thinks of Mark Belling is of little interest. What is of interest is the business climate in Wisconsin. If it were excellent, or even good, business expansion would be much stronger than it is.
There is only one reason why Wisconsin is so low on the business climate list. Taxes and regulation. It's up to the voters. They have to elect business friendly politicians. That means politicians with goals to reduce taxes and reduce regulations to the level of the current top 5 states.
Posted by: Russ Burkel | May 30, 2008 at 04:08 PM
Something I've NEVER understood about talk radio (right wing and otherwise) is why it is perceived as being so influential. These hosts are entertainers, first and foremost. Their audiences are NOT a broad-based slice of the public at large. Nevertheless, the PERCEPTION (and perception is frequently reality) is that talk radio influences public policy and public opinion.
What is troubling to me is the fact that the push for ideological purity (on both ends of the spectrum) fails to develop sensible, long-term solutions. Or, for that matter, produce leaders with much character. For proof, look no further than the leadership in both houses of the Wisconsin Legislature and the "silence" within the state's business community regarding the WMC.
Today's information age is a wonderful thing in many respects, as I'm sure you'd agree. But, an unfortunate byproduct is the never-ending street brawls cheered on by folks behind the microphone who are driven by ratings and, sadly, the perceptions that have become reality.
Posted by: StopthemadnessNOW | May 31, 2008 at 09:06 AM
"If it were excellent, or even good, business expansion would be much stronger than it is."
I'd say that is a false premise, Russ. Expansion can only go on for so long, right? Can't we reach a robust economy and stay right there? And I'd say that expansion isn't always a good thing. Consider the Bush economy. Is there any doubt that their policy was to open the flow of money supply via cheap credit rates, tax breaks, etc.? The result was a home-building frenzy, i.e., expansionism. It's a bad way to build an economy because it isn't self-sustaining. It burns out, and we are seeing that effect right now.
As for Wisconsin, there were Republicans cutting taxes for fifteen or twenty years. So why isn't the economy great (by your definition) right now? Certainly economic policy hasn't significantly changed under Doyle. (Note that states, unlike the federal government, are supposed to have balanced budgets.) Economic policy has an effect two, three years down the road, not immediately.
The low corporate taxes, the tax loopholes, the roads built for strip mall mega-stores have placed a big advantage in the chain stores and destroyed the locally-owned commerce.
There was a recent legislative change that was significant:
http://www.wisconsinsfuture.org/
"The measure shut down the use of intricate tax techniques to avoid taxes by having one branch of a company pay rent to another branch of the same company."
Bad for national corporate chains, good for local business.
Ultimately, the price of oil plays a big part in the economy as well. One can't mention taxation and regulation and overlook the price of oil, because contrary to what stock analysts have told us during the tech meltdown of 2001, we are not "not dependent on oil like we were in the 1970s".
As for regulation, Russ, apparently you haven't read the stories about toys, toothpaste, and medicine from China.
Posted by: Dan Sebald | June 02, 2008 at 03:08 AM
Paul, We lovingly refer to him as Mark Bellowing, for both the his annoying voice level and his blowhard rants.
Guess what? I've met him in person on two different occasions (public domain, not private functions) and he's an even more arrogant D-head in person. Imagine that.
Posted by: MilwBorn | June 02, 2008 at 12:31 PM