A confession: I could never get through "Atlas Shrugged." Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Clarence Thomas and any number of deep thinkers published in the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal notwithstanding, I found the writing turgid, the political and economic points simplistic, and the characters and plot overblown. (However, it does make "The Fountainhead" seem readable by comparison.)
Why care at this late date? Well, it seems that Ron Johnson has been taking some cues from the "Tea Party" and citing "Atlas Shrugged" as a "driving force in his political philosophy." In last night's debate with Russ Feingold:
Asked by a panelist about the book, Johnson said "Atlas" represents the producers of the world, while "Shrugged" represents how overburdened the producers are with rules, regulations and taxes.
"It's a warning of what could happen to America," Johnson said. "When you hear people talk about a tipping point, that's what we're concerned about. . . . We have more people who are net beneficiaries of government than are actually paying into the system. That's a very serious thing to think about."
"I believe in the community," Feingold responded. "I believe in the community of Wisconsin. . . . You believe the producers are a very special group of people. I guess they're better than the rest of us. When things aren't going their way, you take the position that people shouldn't have unemployment compensation because you have the view they don't want to work."
Screenwriter John Rogers nailed the appeal of "Atlas Shrugged" in his Kung Fu Monkey blog:
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
However, I suspect that Fortunate Son-In-Law Ron Johnson's interest in "Atlas Shrugged" is of more recent origin. Having started married into a company, grown the business without any government help, and become horrified by enamored with the business climate in Communist China, Johnson now identifies with the "Atlas Shrugged" hero, industrial entrepreneur John Galt.
But would John Galt, an anti-religious figure, have argued against the Child Victims Act on behalf of the Green Bay Diocese Finance Council? Would Galt be against embryonic stem cell research on religious grounds, in spite of the negative economic consequences for Wisconsin and the limiting of possible therapy options? Where would Ron Johnson be without Howard Curler's money?
Maybe "Atlas Shrugged" is a "driving force in his political philosophy" only when Ron Johnson finds it convenient.
I bet he couldn't get through that whole mess of a book either.
- Barry Orton