On July 14, 2009, in the wake of the legislature adopting a new state budget, we got this story from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (MJS): Business leaders decry tax increases in state budget
I was prepared for the worst, and the lede justified my concerns:
While providing a welcome boost to high-tech entrepreneurship, Wisconsin's new budget on the whole solidifies the perception of the state as a tax-happy, business-unfriendly place, company owners and leaders of business groups say.
The carefully crafted introduction was loaded: ...the state as a tax-happy, business-unfriendly place...
Of course it was preceded by the perception, least anyone believe that this might be the party line over at the MJS.
Critical to all of this was the source of such concerns, company owners and leaders of business groups.
I needed to know who were these key players in the state so I read on. Business owner Michael L. Hansen pulled no punches, "They've sure given a lot of people the impetus to get the hell out of here." Lots of facts, lots of data and no emotional response, just the way Hansen makes decisions at his place of business?
We learn later in the article:
Hansen, 58, moved recently from Wisconsin to Florida - because of the weather, not taxes - but still has his business interests here, and a summer home in the North Woods. Wisconsin, he said, isn't doing much to help itself foster a strong private sector.
The article is actually more balanced than the headline.
There was the usual failure to note the distinction between taxes and fees, and what that means in terms of total revenues collected. Wisconsin, while a high tax state, is a low fee state and consequently total revenues collected from both individuals and businesses puts us in the middle of the rankings of state spending - something lost on Todd Berry and the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance - or did Berry caution the MJS and the author fail to put it in?
The remainder of the article contains perspectives from Zach Brandon from the Wisconsin Department of Commerce, Tom Still from the Wisconsin Technology Council, and even some moderate tones from Wisconsin Manufactures and Commerce (WMC).
That left only the aforementioned Hansen and John Gard to take the conversation over the edge. Gard:
There was an assault on job creators, It sends a signal to people not to invest here."
Which leaves the rest of us wondering what was the point of the story.